top of page
Foundations of American Government

United States Constitution

  

SS.7.C.1.5

Identify how the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation led to the writing of the Constitution..

​

After drafting the Declaration of Independence, the colonists needed to create a system of government for the new and independent nation.  The first government of the United States was the Articles of Confederation.  The colonists chose to create a confederation which is a state-centered, decentralized (no central power) government where the main powers of government were controlled by the states.  The Articles of Confederation was a direct response to the long list of grievances (complaints) against King George III, the monarch who controlled the executive, legislative, and judicial powers for the colonies.  When one person controls all aspects of government, this is called a unitary system.

To avoid a unitary system from forming in the new nation, the colonists decided to create a confederal government that was very different.  This new confederation would have a system of government with no central power that would reflect the colonists’ fear of a powerful national government.  Since the colonists were hoping to avoid a powerful national government and leader, they included some very strict limits on the government that has been identified as weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation.

​

Below is a list of these weaknesses:

Congress could not collect money from the state to create and pay for an army and navy to defend the nation.

Congress could not collect money from the state to create and pay for an army and navy to defend the nation.

Congress had no power to:

TAX
Hover
to find out why.

The laws that Congress passed had no real influence on the people because they were not being enforced, and therefore, did not have to be followed.

Congress had no power to:

ENFORCE ITS OWN LAWS
Hover
to find out why.

The laws that Congress passed had no real influence on the people because they were not being enforced, and therefore, did not have to be followed

Congress had no power to:

REGULATE TRADE
Hover
to find out why.

There wasn't a set of national rules or national organizations that would determine how the laws should be applied. Thus, there was no judicial branch.

THE

NATIONAL GOVERNMENT LACKED

A NATIONAL COURT SYSTEM
Hover
to find out why.

There was no chief executive who could manage the national government. This means there was no executive branch.

THE

NATIONAL GOVERNMENT LACKED

Central Leadership
Hover
to find out why.

Changing the government was very difficult. If one state legislature did not like a proposed change, it could vote against the amendment which would prevent change from taking place even if the other 12 states agreed on the amendment.

Amendments to the Articles of Confederation required

       ???       

of the 13 state legislatures.

Unanimous
consent
Hover
to find out why.

Because the Articles of Confederation created a decentralized (no central power) system of government, each state-operated as an independent country in many ways.  Each state was able to make trade agreements with other nations, each state established its own military, and each state made laws that its residents were expected to follow.  The result of these actions was that the states were not operating as one nation and were, therefore, weak and could be attacked by other countries. Adding to these concerns was Shays’s Rebellion.  Shays’s Rebellion is the name given to an event where 2000 western Massachusetts farmers protested in county courthouses to prevent the government from taking their farm lands.  The government of Massachusetts was threatening to take the land from these farmers because they had not paid their taxes and other debts (something owed, such as money) during the Revolutionary War, even though the government told them they did not have to pay those taxes.  Because the government of Massachusetts had not held up their end of the bargain, the farmers revolted.

​

Shays’s Rebellion made leaders within the national government examine the Articles of Confederation a little more closely.  In February of 1787, five states sent representatives to meet in Annapolis, Maryland to determine what to do next.  They decided to call for a meeting of all 13 states to meet in Philadelphia that summer with the main purpose of fixing the Articles of Confederation.  This meeting in Philadelphia would later be known as the Constitutional Convention because this is where the U. S. Constitution was written to replace the Articles of Confederation.

SS.7.C.1.6

Interpret the intentions of the Preamble of the U.S. Constitution.

​

The U.S. Constitution begins with a one-sentence introduction called the Preamble. The Preamble explains the goals and purposes of the government.  The Preamble begins with the phrase “We the People, of the United States” and then states six goals and purposes of the government: 1. form a more perfect union, 2. establish justice, 3. insure domestic tranquility, 4. provide for the common defence, 5. promote the general welfare, and 6. secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity. The Preamble ends with the phrase: “do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America”. The final phrase of the Preamble means that the people establish the U.S. Constitution to begin a new national government. 

SS.7.C.1.6

Interpret the intentions of the Preamble of the U.S. Constitution.

​

The U.S. Constitution begins with a one-sentence introduction called the Preamble. The Preamble explains the goals and purposes of the government.  The Preamble begins with the phrase “We the People, of the United States” and then states six goals and purposes of the government: 1. form a more perfect union, 2. establish justice, 3. insure domestic tranquility, 4. provide for the common defense, 5. promote the general welfare, and 6. secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity. The Preamble ends with the phrase: “do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America”. The final phrase of the Preamble means that the people establish the U.S. Constitution to begin a new national government. 

Secure liberty and freedom for current and future generation.

ESTABLISH

JUSTICE

Hover
to find out how.

Government will protect citizens from conflict in the country and make sure that states do not go to war with each other.

InSURE DOMESTIC TRANQUILITY

Hover
to find out how.

To establish something by law.

ORDAIN

Hover
to find out how.

Protect the country from other countries or groups that might try to harm us.

PROVIDE FOR THE COMMON DEFENSE.

Hover
to find out how.

Government is focused on the public interest and that every state and individual can benefit from what the government can provide.

PROMOTE THE GENERAL WELFARE

Hover
to find out how.

Secure liberty and freedom for current and future generation.

SECURE THE BLESSINGS OF LIBERTY TO OURSELVES AND OUR POSTERITY

Hover
to find out how.

The Preamble begins with the phrase, “We the People”.  The writers of the U.S. Constitution began the Preamble with these words to guarantee that the people would be the source of the government’s power and that power would not fall into the hands of a single king or ruler. By starting the Preamble in this way, the writers were making it clear that the government not only receives its power from the people but also exists to serve them. The writers of the U.S. Constitution also knew that the power of the document depended on the approval of the majority of the people.

​

The U.S. Constitution begins with a one-sentence introduction called the Preamble. The Preamble explains the goals and purposes of the government.  The Preamble begins with the phrase “We the People, of the United States” and then states six goals and purposes of the government: 1. form a more perfect union, 2. establish justice, 3. insure domestic tranquility, 4. provide for the common defense, 5. promote the general welfare, and 6. secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity. The Preamble ends with the phrase: “do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America”. The final phrase of the Preamble means that the people establish the U.S. Constitution to begin a new national government. 

​

 

SS.7.C.1.7

Describe how the Constitution limits the powers of government through separation of powers and checks and balances.

​

The Constitution includes the principle of limited government. This means that government can do only what the people allow it to do. In the United States, the government is limited in power by a constitution or written agreement. Constitutional government is a form of government based on a written set of laws to which all citizens agree. In this form of government, the Constitution is the highest law of the land. The Constitution limits the power of both the federal and state governments. It says what each may and may not do. Constitutional government is organized in such a way that one person or group cannot get enough power to control the government.

​

The writers of the U.S. Constitution, known as Framers, acted to protect Americans against governmental abuse of power. In order to set limits on power, the Framers divided the federal government into three branches. This separation of powers sets up three branches with their own distinct powers and responsibilities. Influenced by French thinker Baron de Montesquieu, the Framers believed that in order to protect the people’s liberty, each branch would have different tasks. This separation of powers, the Framers believed, would limit the ability of any one branch from gaining too much power. 

 

This system was set up to limit the authority of the government. However, the Framers still feared that one branch of government could gain control of the other two. In order to ensure no one of the three branches would become too powerful, they established checks and balances. The principle of checks and balances allows each branch of government to limit the power of the other branches.

​

Students will analyze how government power is limited by separation of powers and checks and balances. To prevent the government from abusing its powers, the U.S. Constitution is organized around a separation of powers system that utilizes checks and balances.  The power to make laws, enforce laws and interpret laws is separated into three different branches of government while the government is further limited by checks and balances by allowing each branch to check or restrain the powers of the other two branches. These are ways that each branch can limit the power of the other two branches.

In a separation of powers system, the power of government is not given to any one branch. Instead, some of the power is given to each branch. The legislative branch has the power to create new laws, the executive branch has the power to carry out and enforce laws, and the judicial branch has the power to interpret laws. Each branch of government can check the powers of the other branches. The executive branch may veto laws passed by Congress, nominate certain government officials and Supreme Court justices, and propose new legislation. The president can make treaties, but they must be ratified by the Senate. The legislative branch can impeach and convict the president, other members of the executive branch, and federal judges. Congress may pass laws over the president’s veto by two-thirds majority vote of both houses. The legislative branch may reject appointments made by the president as well as propose amendments to the United States Constitution. The judicial branch may declare executive actions and laws passed by Congress unconstitutional.  This power of judicial review allows U.S. courts to examine the laws or actions of the legislative and executive branches of the government and to determine whether such actions are consistent with the U.S. Constitution. Judicial review is an important check on the legislative and executive branches because it prevents them from straying too far from the Constitution. The Supreme Court case that established the power of judicial review in Marbury v. Madison. Since the judicial branch has the power to interpret laws, it must be able to determine if a law is unconstitutional and declare it “null and void”.

​

This system of distributed and shared powers spelled out in the U.S. Constitution provides limited government to prevent the abuse of power. 

A form of government based on a written set of laws that all citizens agree to.  In this form of government, the constitution is the highest law of the land.

Constitutional Government

A government that has been limited in power by a constitution, or written agreement.

Limited
Government

To bring formal charges of wrongdoing against a public official

(such as the U.S. President).

Impeach

The power of the U.S. courts to examine the laws or actions of the legislative and executive branches of the government and to determine whether such actions are consistent with the U.S. Constitution.

Judicial
Review

To confirm by expressing consent or approval.

Ratify

A decision by an executive authority such as a president or governor to reject a proposed law or stature.

Veto

SS.7.C.1.8

Explain the viewpoints of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists regarding the ratification of the Constitution and inclusion of a bill of rights.

 

The Federalists, who spread their views in writings called the Federalist Papers, wanted the states to ratify the Constitution as written in 1787. This would create a federal system of government in the United States where the central government would share power with the states. Federalists believed that the way the government was set up under the new Constitution provided protection for people’s rights in the following ways:

 

  • Constitutional big ideas such as separation of powers and the system of checks and balances protected the people because no branch of government could get too strong.

  • By not listing specific rights in the Constitution, the people were protected better than they would be if the rights were actually listed. This is because it is impossible to list all of the rights of the people. Listing any specific rights might have meant the government could violate any unenumerated (not listed) rights.

  • Federalists thought that the Constitution would better unite the country and would lead to the growth of more business than would be possible if the Articles of Confederation were kept as the system of government.

 

The Anti-Federalists, who published their views as the Anti-Federalist Papers, were against the ratification of the Constitution and only wanted to make minor changes to the government as set up under the Articles of Confederation. They thought that the Constitution made a national government that was too strong and thought that the Constitution shouldn’t be passed for the following reasons:

​

  • Too much power would be taken away from the states.

  • The Constitution needed a specific listing of rights to protect the people from the national government.

  • The national government would be allowed to keep an army in times of peace.

  • The “necessary and proper” clause, also known as the “elastic clause,” of the constitution would give too much power to the Congress.

  • The Executive Branch would be too strong.

  • The system of government (federalism) described in the Constitution was too new and untested – few governments around the world had tried such a method.

  • The way that the Constitution was to be ratified would conflict with the Articles of Confederation (which required the unanimous consent of all 13 states for any amendments; the ratification of the Constitution required 9 of 13 states in order for the new government to take effect).

  • A country the size of the United States could not be governed by one central government.

Power between the states and national government.

An enumerated listing of individual rights.

Legislative Powers.

Powers of the National Government.

The country needed to be united.

Federalist Viewpoint

Concern about government power.

The national government would have enumerated (listed) powers that would protect people no matter the state in which they lived.

Concern about government.

By not listing specific rights in the Constitution, the people were better protected than they would be if the rights were actually listed. 

Concern about government power.

The necessary and proper clause/elastic clause would allow Congress to respond to the needs of all the people.

Concern about government power.

Separation of Powers and checks and balances protected the people from any branch of government becoming too strong.

Concern about government power.

The Constitution would be better to unite the country than the Articles of Confederation.

Anti-Federalist Viewpoint

Concern about government power.

Too much power would be taken from the states; a federal system was too new and untested.

Concern about government power.

The Constitution needed a specific listing of rights to protect the people from the national government.

Concern about government power.

The necessary and proper clause/elastic clause would give too much power to Congress.

Concern about government power.

Separation of Powers and checks and balances did not protect people from any branch of government becoming too strong.

Concern about government power.

The nation could be united while the states would keep their individual identities.

Most importantly, the Anti-Federalists thought it was important for the Constitution to include a bill of rights. This listing of specific rights protecting the speech, property and religious expression of the people, among many other rights, would protect the people from the federal government abusing its power. The way that the British treated the colonists before they declared independence was fresh in their minds and many Americans felt that a specific listing of rights was needed.

The Constitution was eventually ratified by all of the states. Soon after ratification, Congress and the states also ratified the Bill of Rights. This compromise allowed the Federalists to get the Constitution ratified while also respecting the Anti-Federalist belief that to ensure that the protection of the rights of the people the Constitution needed a Bill of Rights.

bottom of page